Popular Articles

'No role for govt, regulator in media, entertainment'
Blaming excessive regulations for the media and entertainment industry’s acute financial crisis, Rupert Murdoch’s Indian venture Star Group today said the government and regulator had no role in the sector.

'Don't deny people of Andhra Pradesh their due share'
The first thing that our government did in 2004 was to implement a large number of programmes to immediately reach out to the farmers and other rural artisans who were in serious distress. These included waiver of the power dues of farmers, supply of seven hours free power to farmers, reschedulement of loans and interest, etc.

News of the day

'US can't interfere in India's domestic climate actions'
Dismissing the US claims that India"s domestic climate actions can be challenged, top environmentalist R K Pachauri today made it clear there was no power granted to America in the Copenhagen accord for such interference.
Online Business

Apex Court overrules HC order favouring Gufic Ltd

The Supreme Court today set aside the Delhi high court order which had allowed the Indian company, Gufic Ltd, to use the name ‘Cliniq’ in its skin care product. The bench headed by Justice B Sudershan Reddy vacated the order on the appeal of Clinique Laboratories against the high court order. - "Power of attorney" sales under SC scanner - NMDC to resume diamond mining at Panna in 3 months: Steel Min - UPDATE:SC allows Paradip Port Trust to reinvite bids for coal berth - US apex court refuses to stay Chrysler-Fiat deal - Patent row: SC allows TVS Motors to manufacture "Flame" - Mumbai SEZ in danger of being scrapped Earlier, the foreign firm selling skin care products had moved a single judge bench of the high court against the use of the word Cliniq by the Indian competitor in similar products. It argued that it would confuse the consumers. Moreover, it claimed that it had regisered the trade mark in 1978 and it has been using it ever since. It contended that the Indian company came into the market with a deceptive name about 20 years later. The judge passed an injunction against the Indian company in December last. But Gufic Ltd appealed to a division bench of the high court, which vacated the injunction. Therefore, Clinique appealed to the Supreme Court. It complained that it was not given a proper chance to argue the case as the court decided the issue in hasty manner. The Supreme Court, after vacating the high court order, sent the dispute back to it for final decision.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):